Summary:
As Aguste Comte
wants, sociology has scientific methods used to understand and predict an
event. As I discussed earlier in my previous blog post, sociologists always
view an event from a different perspective and continue to question it. To get
things that can be considered valid, they must use methods that are
acknowledged as true. This includes determining the type of approach, making
hypotheses and deductions, conducting experiments and evaluations and finally
drawing conclusions from the results of the research that has been done.
Although it
almost looks the same as science studies, research in social studies
(sociology) has several obstacles that are difficult to avoid. For example,
humans as the main subject of sociology are very complex creatures. Unlike
testing the thickness of a steel, sociological research cannot be done by just
“putting humans” in the lab. This will only eliminate the factors that
influence and are very important to be taken into account in a study.
Besides that, another
problem is how the subjectivity of the researcher can influence the validity of
the results of the research conducted. Every researcher has an opinion, and
ignoring the opinion of the researcher in the factors that influence the
results of the research will become very ignorant.
Besides
methodology, the important thing of a research is theory. According to
Hedriksen (1992), the notion of theory is an arrangement of hypotheses,
concepts, and pragmatic principles that form the general framework of reference
for a questionable field. Theory consists of two components, the data and the
proposed relationship. Without these two things, a theory would not be
recognized as the truth.
In sociology,
there are several prominent theories, including Conflict Theory, Symbolic
Interactionism, Role Theory, Feminist Theory, and many more. These theories are
considered good in resolving a social event that is happening. But this does
not rule out the possibility of challenging these theories.
What was interesting/what did you learn
Feminist
theory is not about focusing on women or even making women feel superior to
men. This theory will only provide equal opportunities for women and men to see
a social event. It is very interesting to know although women were often
eliminated from the making of a theory, figures such as Dorothy E. Smith, Myra
Marx Ferree, Joan Acker, and many more opened the opportunity for female
sociologists to work in this field. The liberal Feminist Theory states that not
only women but men are also harmed by society because they have to meet certain
expectations. I strongly agree, because this kind of limitation, will greatly
limit the freedom that everyone should have.
Discussion
Point
Humans are very
complex creatures, the experiences they experience greatly influence the
decisions taken in the present. How does a sociologist observe subjects who are
influenced by experiences that cannot be observed right away and still retain
the truth of their research results?
It is really interesting to know about the feminist theory, because it is about equality opportunity for woman and man. I want to ask one thing, is it possible that there is still no equality of opportunities in one country? Why?
ReplyDelete