Summary
We could see the causes of war in a variety of disciplines. There are as many different accounts of the difficulties of studying the causes of war as there are of almost different numbers of wars. "It is difficult to extract a powerful general principle that explains and categorizes the transformation from peace to war or from war," Bolding said. Therefore, when it comes to the causes of war, it is most desirable to define them in a comprehensive range of psychology, sociology, anthropology, and politics. In other words, ways of constraining humans and human activities that give incentives and purposes to group behavior will provide a more useful means of revealing the causes of war.
Interesting
What was really interesting was that the cause of the war could be reflected in conflict theory. It was very interesting because it was a totally unexpected way. A micro-level approach to war causes looked at the causes of conflict, focusing on the role of 'psychological factors,' as well as theories that seek out the origin of conflict and the cause of war in human nature and human behavior.
Discussion
While all of these points provide useful insight into the causes of war, neither can be established as a complete general theory of the causes of war. In other words, although these may explain the conditions or factors that could lead to war, they do not provide a more specific explanation of why war actually takes place. So I wondered why the cause of the war actually occurred. Historically, there have been many wars, each for its own reasons. Through these historical records, I want to know why war actually takes place.
No comments:
Post a Comment